|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Date:
|
9/10/2024 - 5:30 PM
|
|
Category:
|
Board Policies, Second Reading
|
|
Type:
|
Action
|
|
Subject:
|
7.17 Consider Approval of the Second Reading, Board Bylaw 9270 Conflict of Interest
|
|
Strategic Plan:
|
|
|
Enclosure
|
BB 9270 Conflict of Interest Comparison Matrix
|
|
File Attachment:
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Bylaw updated to reflect NEW LAW (SB 1439, 2022) which makes applicable to elected district officers the prohibition against accepting, soliciting, or directing a contribution of more than $250 from any party or participant to a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, including a contract, or from that person's agent, while the proceeding is pending before the Board and for 12 months following the date a final decision is rendered in the proceeding, and from participating in making, or in any way attempting to use the official position to influence the Board's decision when a district officer received a contribution of more than $250 from a party or participant in the preceding 12 months, as specified. The bylaw was also updated to clarify, for a Board member who manages public investments, that when an item on the consent calendar is one in which the Board member has a financial interest, the Board member is required to either make a motion to remove the item from the consent calendar or abstain from voting on the consent calendar.
|
|
Funding:
|
|
|
Recommendation:
|
It is recommended that the Governing Board of Trustees approve the second reading and adopt Board Bylaw 9270, Conflict of Interest.
|
|
Approvals:
|
|
Recommended By:
|
|
Signed By:
|
|
|
Martha Bootsma - Administrative Assistant
|
|
|
Signed By:
|
|
|
Jesse M. Najera - Superintendent
|
|
|
|
|
Vote Results:
|
| Original Motion | | Member Mark Staggs Moved, Member Brian Boatwright seconded to approve the Original motion 'It is recommended that the Governing Board of Trustees approve the second reading and adopt Board Bylaw 9270, Conflict of Interest.'. Upon a Roll-Call Vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5 Nay: 0. | | The motion Carried 5 - 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|